{"article_url":"https://newsverum.com/ar/news/duke-study-finds-chatbots-align-with-human-legal-reasoning-with-gaps","block":{"description":{"ar":"تقييمات لما يعد «معقولاً» عبر 25 سيناريو قانونياً.","de":"Bewertung dessen, was in 25 rechtlichen Szenarien „angemessen“ war.","en":"Assessments of what was “reasonable” across 25 legal scenarios.","es":"Evaluaciones de lo que era «razonable» en 25 escenarios legales.","fr":"Évaluations de ce qui était « raisonnable » dans 25 scénarios juridiques.","pt":"Avaliações do que seria «razoável» em 25 cenários jurídicos.","tr":"25 hukuki senaryoda “makul” görülen yanıtları değerlendirme."},"id":"study-record","items":[{"date":"2026-10-15","description":{"ar":"500 مشاركاً و26 نموذجاً للذكاء الاصطناعي و25 سيناريو.","de":"500 Teilnehmende, 26 KI-Modelle und 25 Szenarien.","en":"500 participants, 26 AI models and 25 scenarios.","es":"500 participantes, 26 modelos de IA y 25 escenarios.","fr":"500 participants, 26 modèles d’IA et 25 scénarios.","pt":"500 participantes, 26 modelos de IA e 25 cenários.","tr":"500 katılımcı, 26 AI modeli ve 25 senaryo."},"label":{"ar":"مقارنة إجابات البشر والنماذج","de":"Vergleich menschlicher Antworten und Modelle","en":"Human and model comparison","es":"Comparación entre respuestas humanas y modelos","fr":"Comparaison entre réponses humaines et modèles","pt":"Comparação de respostas humanas e modelos","tr":"İnsan ve model karşılaştırması"},"status":"occurred"}],"methodology":{"ar":"المنهج والنتائج وفق ملخص ديوك وبحث arXiv. وتقتصر النتائج على عينة الدراسة وسيناريوهاتها ولا تثبت أداءً موثقاً في أحكام المحاكم.","de":"Methoden und Ergebnisse laut Duke und arXiv-Arbeit. Die Ergebnisse sind auf Stichprobe und Szenarien begrenzt und belegen keine validierte Leistung in Gerichtsverfahren.","en":"Methods and findings as reported by Duke and the arXiv paper. Results are limited to the study sample and scenarios; they do not establish validated courtroom decision performance.","es":"Métodos y hallazgos según Duke y el artículo de arXiv. Los resultados se limitan a la muestra y escenarios del estudio; no validan el desempeño en tribunales.","fr":"Méthode et résultats selon Duke et l’article arXiv. Les résultats se limitent à l’échantillon et aux scénarios étudiés; ils ne valident pas une performance judiciaire en conditions réelles.","pt":"Métodos e resultados conforme Duke e o artigo do arXiv. Os resultados se limitam à amostra e aos cenários do estudo e não comprovam desempenho validado em tribunais.","tr":"Duke’un haber özeti ve arXiv makalesindeki yöntem ve bulgular. Sonuçlar çalışmadaki katılımcı örneklemi ve senaryolarla sınırlıdır; mahkemelerde doğrulanmış karar performansı göstermez."},"sourceUrls":["https://law.duke.edu/news/how-well-do-chatbots-and-humans-agree-legal-reasonableness"],"title":{"ar":"دراسة المعقولية القانونية","de":"Studie zu rechtlicher Angemessenheit","en":"Legal-reasonableness study","es":"Estudio de razonabilidad jurídica","fr":"Étude sur le caractère raisonnable en droit","pt":"Estudo de razoabilidade jurídica","tr":"Hukuki makullük çalışması"},"type":"events","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T10:20:41+00:00"},"version":1}